They knew I’d be back.
Topps
those sly devils.
Sure,
they delayed the release.
There
was a part of me that even thought, hell, maybe they won’t even do it this
year.
Maybe
they’re done.
After
all, whenever I go to the MLB Store in Midtown, the only product I ever see
there in bulk, not moving like the other sets…is Heritage.
Heritage
are the only cards I’ve ever seen discounted at the MLB Store.
A
part of me thought the big boys at Fanatics would look at the cost vs profits,
or whatever big boys in finance do, and say, nah, this product ain’t cutting
it.
But….
Here
we are.
And…
There I go.
I
know I’ve slagged off Heritage here…a lot. If anyone has been on this sports
card blogging journey with me, you’d know that I’ve started and stopped putting
together every single (minus 2022) Heritage set since I got back into
collecting in 2019. I’ve accused Heritage of being disingenuous. A bad representation
of the real thing. I’ve bemoaned short print cards. I’ve sworn up and down that
I’d never open up another pack of Heritage, and only buy the singles of Pirates
and players that I wanted.
Yet…
Okay…there’s
a reason I’m back at it with Heritage this year and, hopefully, ONLY this year.
Two reasons, actually.
First…it’s
my birth year set. Back when I got into collecting, and honestly thought that
Heritage was all that I was going to collect, I had this idea that when the 1974
design came around, I’d try to collect it AND the original 1974 set. I started
on the original ’74 set back in early 2020. That lasted until I bought a batch
of star cards from ComC, and then promptly decided that I wanted them for my
PC.
This also
occurred around the time that I began to get frustrated with the short print
cards in Heritage.
To
understand my second reason, you’d have to read this blog post right HERE.
I don’t
want to say building 1974 Heritage is some kind of a penance…it isn’t. I don’t
waste money.
But,
I guess, for good and bad reasons, I feel very connected to this set.
And
2023 Heritage is very…Heritagey.
Yes,
Topps gets the design right.
The
company mimics the photography of the original set to an annoying degree.
There’s
the requisite bells and whistles.
That's out if 74 on the Scherzer for you folks into nmbered cards
Some big boys
And this:
Usually I trade auto cards away...I'm thinking of keeping this one though.
Although I know there's not enough Bells and Whistles for a lot of collectors, which is why I’m guessing I was able to find the last few editions of Heritage at a discount.
There’s
confounding stuff like this.
This
isn’t a big complaint on my part. When I was a kid, if a player changed teams
in the off-season, you were almost 100% guaranteed that player would be in the
next year’s base set in an outdated uniform. That doesn’t seem to be the case
now. Cutch is in a Pirates uniform in this year’s Big-League set. The on-fire
Luis Arraez is clad as a Marlin. In this year’s Heritage, Arraez is still a
Twin.
I
guess it’s just one of those things.
Another
one of those things, is Topps getting slap happy with the RC card logo.
I
site another example from my Pittsburgh Pirates.
I
believe the popular version of this error comes in the form of a Bobby Witt Jr.
card with him in the Kansas City Monarchs uniform. Mr. Witt Jr, a much (if you’re
into that thing) sought after rookie card in 2022, gets another shot at rookie
fame here in 2023 Heritage.
One
last, the whole ordeal with the missing city on the California (I still call
them that) Angels cards.
As best
I know of the situation, and it’s not much, but when Art Moreno bought the then
Anaheim Angels, he changed the team’s name to the Los Angeles Angels (or if you’re
not into the whole brevity thing the Los Angeles Angels of Anaheim). Lawsuits
were filed over the name change, and once the suit was dismissed the team
changed its name to simply The Angels. No city designation. Therefore, no city
designation on Topps cards.
It
makes Angels Heritage cards look awkward.
That said,
it shows that a lot of collectors ignored Archives, because Topps has been
doing this for a few years now.
But
we’ll see.
I say
a lot of things.
I
make a lot of collecting plans.
But I
also know that there’s a big box in my apartment full of Topps Heritage cards
from 2019-2022.
Anyway….
Lastly, thank you to all of you and your kind words regarding Russell Streur. I'm glad you all enjoyed his writing here and elsewhere.
Thanks for reading! Happy Collecting!
Next week: Series 2 is on the table. After that, we’re
going hunting for the GRAIL…or maybe the Grail…I haven’t sorted that out yet.
Yeah Topps hasn't named the Angels city since 2005 but the decision to leave one pennant blank has never been a good one (especially since Topps has had almost two decades to figure out a better solution). It's really weird. "Los Angeles Angels" is an active live registered trademark held by the Angels (https://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4801:7e7unk.2.20 ) so the fact that Topps doesn't use it seems almost like the Angels have forbidden them from doing so. Topps has also used things like LAA for the Angels in recent memory as well so it's not like *anything* which references LA is forbidden either.
ReplyDeleteit does look very awkard, i'd almost be happy if they just used Angels twice on the cards.
DeleteThe blank Angels pennant is dumb as hell, I don't care what the reason is behind it, anything else would've been better.
ReplyDeleteThat said (and all the other Heritage drawbacks), I can't get over how much I love many of these cards.
Agreed, it is dumb...but i guess the fear of litigation wins every time. Topps seems to have put some creative muscle into this year's Heritage. I wish they'd stop with the short print business but...
Delete