I like 1989 Bowman baseball cards.
I
don’t know if that’s such a controversial or taboo thing to say in the realm of
sports card/baseball card collecting in 2021. I’ve gotten to know a lot of
collectors since I’ve been back in the hobby and, other than the decades-long
complaints about storage (for those who don’t know, 1989 Bowman cards are
bigger than the standard 2 ½” X 3 ¾” card), a lot of the other collectors that
I’ve met seem to have a soft spot in their hearts for the set. Maybe that’s the
effect of time and age. Or maybe it’s that collectors have finally seen the aesthetic
value in a plain, solid set of baseball cards in an era where frills, bells and
whistles are all the rage.
Or
maybe it’s the chance of opening a pack of 1989 Bowman cards today, and getting
this bad boy in perfect, gradable condition.
If grading is your thing.
To
be honest, I don’t even remember any kids hating 1989 Bowman baseball cards
back in 1989. From what I remember we were vacuums for whatever cards were
coming out back then. Topps, Fleer, Donruss, Score, Upper Deck (to a small
financial extent) and Bowman; it was all gravy to us. But opening a pack of
Bowman cards in 1989 was like opening history. Bowman hadn’t been around since
Topps bought them in the 1950s. Older Bowman cards were unattainable cards at
card shows and at our local LCS. The ones we ripped open in 1989 had that
instant vintage feel. Plain and straight to business. They looked like
something we would be unattainable at a card show or a local LCS. But they
were just as cheap and plentiful as the rest.
Even if the card backs were a little confounding upon first look.
Personally, I’ve always been more of a comprehensive statistics reader, so team-by-team performance breakdown on the backs of the early Bowman cards never really did it for me. Though I can see the appeal now, and actually quite enjoy reading a player’s statistics that way.
But
the stat layout didn’t stop me from buying a boatload of 1989 Bowman cards, or
seeking out ways to store them; protect the ones that I thought were valuable.
I’m a staunch leftist/modernist in some aspects, but in others, like trading
cards, I’m a pretty big traditionalist. And 1989 Bowman was right in my
wheelhouse. Each pack even included a replica of a vintage Bowman card from
their heyday.
Pretty cool, huh?
I remained a Bowman fan even after 1989.
I bought a ton of 1990 Bowman
and a ton of 1991 Bowman as well.
I appreciated Bowman's simple, throwback designs, in an era of card collecting that was beginning to emphasize flash and premium value. But, by 1992, as with most of the other card brands (save Topps), I was out of the Bowman game. It was for the best too, as Bowman took steps and leaps in their brand that I would’ve found unappealing then, and am not a particular fan of now. That means, they modernized by 1992. Spruced up the designs. Got as modern as everyone else.
Bowman found their niche by putting the focus on rookie cards.
And
that’s the thing with Bowman to this day. The emphasis on rookie cards. Or pre-rookie
cards if you want to be exact. Yes, you can now have a card of a player before
they have a so-called real card. I know…it confused me too at first. But basically,
to look at modern Bowman cards is to look at cards as a way of doing player
prospecting, hoping for a return on value some 3-5 years later. Although some
of the cards of these kids catch a premium value right out of the pack, with
collectors paying $10-$40 or more for base 1st Bowman cards of some of
the game’s top, yet unproven, prospects. And because of the speculation aspect
of Bowman, hobby boxes and all others related to Bowman, can get quite expensive
on the secondary market.
That is to say, I don’t buy much Bowman.
But I have, for the past two years, bought some Bowman cards of players that I like and/or collect. Here's a sampling:
And modern Bowman cards are…okay? That is to say the releases are pretty standard. A white bordered front with a player photo, and a white bordered back with the player information. Just the facts.
Case in point. Here is a Pete
Alonso card from 2020 Bowman.
And here’s Pete Alonso from 2021 Bowman.
But where I found the older Bowman cards plainness to be endearing and nostalgic, I find modern Bowman design to by bland by way of simply being practical. You want an Austin Martin 1st Bowman card?
Here.
But no frills…unless you can find a chrome card or one of the parallel or autograph cards.
Yes…modern Bowman card are caught up in the false scarcity game as well. The brand is a Topps product after all.
Usually I intersplice some kind of personal reflection or story in these post…and I’ve been batting 1989 around in my head this whole week trying to come up with something. But truth be told, I was a pretty depressed kid by the summer of 1989. I was fifteen and had just finished my freshman year in high school. I was obesely overweight. That summer, I spent a week at some leadership camp (not sleep over) and remember really being into this girl named Jenny. I spent that week not ingesting any of the lessons that they tried to impart on us kids, but spent the week watching Jenny fall for this other guy. All I wanted to do was leave that program, go home, and mess with my baseball cards. Or listen to my New Edition and Bobby Brown cassette tapes.
I feel like 1989 was the last year that I was so heavily into baseball cards, even though I collected until 1992. The last year they were so all encompassing to my life. My family took a trip to Cooperstown that summer as well, and I think, more than the Baseball Hall of Fame, I was enamored with the number of baseball card dealers that were scattered throughout the town. Some of them had stuff that I never seen. Like Minor League team sets. I remember buying a Buffalo Bisons team set on that trip, as they were the Pirates AAA affiliate back then. And a signed photo of Bobby Bonilla for $5.
Christ, imagine buying a signed anything for a, at the time, star player, for $5.
Anyway….
Thanks for reading! Happy Collecting.
If you’d like to know more about the 1989 Bowman set you can do so HERE.
Next Friday: Um…let’s go back to 1986. We’ll talk a little bit about some of my favorite 1986 cards, even though I’m no longer a big fan of the 1986 Topps set. Also, little league. I’m going to discuss little league and my history as a quitter.
Yeah the knock on modern Bowman is that every year looks the same. And yeah it does. Not my thing but I do (or did) enjoy grabbing Bowman cards of players who I might see at local minor league games and trying to get them signed. When I was a kid my only options for the were the Team USA cards and #1 Draft Pick cards.
ReplyDeleteThe autograph part I can see a putting modern Bowman to good use. I don't mind modern Bowman, but it's not anything I'm going to collect minus a few players. Although I'd say cost more than the aesthetic value of the cards is what's truly keeping me from buying many.
DeleteIf you don't need the cards *right now* you can get the ones you want for pretty cheap starting a month or so after release. Definitely not a set for ripping. But if you do the MiLB autograph thing you can get a bunch for cheap (maybe a buck per card max if it's a hot player since people only want the chrome 1st bowman card).
DeleteCan't say I collected any Bowman sets when they returned to the scene in '89. Didn't even know they existed in the early '90s.
ReplyDeleteBut at least those look like something. These sets Bowman has been putting out the past 7, 8 years it seems like they're determined to make them indefinable, indistinguishable and destined to rot in dime boxes as people flip past them saying, "was that from 2019 or 2018?"
1989 was right in my wheelhouse for collection. Probably the last year that I wasn't selective at all. I honestly loved 1989 Bowman for it's simplicity and ode to the past. Felt the same way with 90 and 91 Bowman. Simple cards that said something. I do find it hard to distinguish Bowman products now and the expense is a real turn-off. But what isn't these days, cost-wise in the hobby, for current stuff?
Delete